Maligned businessman, hopefully our social media, big winners in Bikoy saga
THE so-called “Bikoy” black propaganda that maligned President Duterte and his family boomeranged against the Yellows, and contributed to voters’ anger toward their candidates, which led to their electoral rout.
It will also likely be another case that will help to finally bring the troublemaker Antonio Trillanes 4th to jail.
The episode though will likely be a boon for Bicolano businessmen Elizaldy Co and his partners in the Misibis Bay resort in Albay. Co last week filed libel charges against Google Philippines, the owner of YouTube and Facebook, and demanded P1.1 billion in damages under the country’s Cybercrime Act.
Included in the charge were the two internet giants’ country directors Kenneth Lingan and John Rubio, respectively. These two though are either just moronic servants, or Yellow sympathizers. Co should sue Google CEO Sundar Pichai and Facebook founder and head Mark Zuckerberg for a billion dollars for their lies against the Republic’s President that their companies spread. That would prod international media — which has been silent on the libel suit — to report it.
Maybe include in the suit the brains of the Bikoy video, Sen. Antonio Trillanes 4th, as soon as there is the slightest evidence that it was mostly his handiwork.
Episode 5 of the Bikoy videos, which Duterte himself has claimed was the handiwork of his strident critic Trillanes, alleged that the businessman Co was the leader of a drug syndicate operating in the region and that the criminal operations were undertaken inside his posh Misibis Bay resort.
Co has vehemently denied these, and claimed that the allegations not only severely tainted his reputation but drastically affected his business, leading to huge financial losses, with banks even closing their credit lines to him.
Open and shut
The suit appears to be an open-and-shut case that would make Co a billion-peso richer. Jurisprudence in many Western countries has turned up decisions that favor similar complainants, although involving much smaller monetary claims. The courts pointed out that such social media businesses that have been making billions of dollars in profits have the responsibility to allocate a few millions to ensure that they do not publish in cyberspace malicious lies against innocent citizens.
Libelous video still out there (above is time-stamp of author’s computer).
However, a few cases in the US, UK and Canada were resolved in favor of the social media platforms, based on two notions.
The first involves the so-called “notice-and-take-down” declared policy of social media platforms. There have been court rulings in the West that acquitted social media venues on the ground that the libelous postings were taken down as soon as the aggrieved party called their attention to it.
However, bolstering many netizens’ suspicions that Facebook and YouTube are run by Filipinos sympathetic to the Yellow Cult, both completely ignored the Bicolano businessman’s demand to take down the video and any postings on the Bikoy allegations last April 26, or four days after Episode 5 containing the libelous accusations was released.
All previous four episodes are in fact still there, YouTube’s way of telling our country to f**k off.
Social media companies’ second defense is that rather than newspapers, their platforms are in reality “libraries,” a notion contained in one US judge’s ruling in 1992 (when social media was in its infancy), which led to the now infamous “Section 230” in the US Communications Decency Act of 1996.
Library books
That is, Section 230 has been used to make the claim that social media postings are just like books in a library, with the library’s owner not even knowing what books were being borrowed, and therefore not liable for their contents.
That certainly would appear to be a preposterous defense for Facebook’s Bikoy video, as the issue had hogged the headlines for a month, with the President of the Republic himself talking about it. It is impossible for Facebook and YouTube not to have noticed the libelous allegations, in which their social media platforms served as the mechanism for their dissemination, not just here but world-wide.
But that kind of defense is obviously applicable only in the 1990s when social media didn’t yet have the colossal audience Facebook and YouTube have now, that they can mold public opinion.
It is indeed so appalling that an anonymous Bikoy would claim without any basis at all that a businessman is a drug lord, with that slander viewed and heard by probably more than 100,000 people viewing his allegation in YouTube, and the accusation having to be reported by traditional media with another 200,000 as its audience. No way can YouTube and Facebook claim they are not involved in this vile deed.
The Bikoy video should be a wake-up call for our judiciary to enforce quickly and strictly the cyberlibel provisions of the 2012 Cybercrime Prevention Act. Maybe even for Congress to amend the law to make it stricter and to require law enforcers to enforce it even before formal court proceedings.
Isn’t it quite ironic — or maybe they’re just demonstrating their Yellow feathers — that Ellen Tordesillas, the head of Vera Files, which is one of Facebook’s “fact-checkers,” strived to get people to view the Bikoy videos, which turned out to be a colossal case of the fakest news? She even tried hard to sell the videos to the country, claiming that they were reporting the truth that the allegations there were, in her words, “riveting”?
Maybe this sickening Bikoy episode will lead to something good: For Facebook and YouTube to stop being venues for spreading calumnies against Filipinos, especially the politically motivated Yellow kind, that are really intended to oust a duly elected president.
Despite its Yellow biases, the kind of lies contained in the Bikoy videos wouldn’t have been published or aired by traditional media, which are by their nature required to comply with journalistic standards of assessing the validity of allegations made against people, even government officials.
Photo credit to AFP and Rappler On Friday, August 17, 2018, President Rodrigo Roa Duterte guaranteed the general population that the 2019 midterm elections would be clean and orderly. These words he announced during the mass oath-taking of members of the regional party Hugpong ng Pagbabago in Davao City, drawing commendation from the individuals who were present at that moment. "In this election I commit to the Filipino people that this will be a clean election" , President Duterte said. Up for snatches for the 2019 elections are 12 seats in the Senate, other positions from district and party-list representatives, governors, mayors to municipal councilors. Photo credit to UNTV The President likewise even asked the Commission on Elections (Comelec) to appoint him as deputy so "there will be voting and the votes will be counted correctly." He further pledged to execute the gun ban amid election period and cautioned the New People...
A French priest has recently gained popularity on the internet for the wrong reasons. A video recently surfaced of the priest slapping a child who could not stop crying during his baptism. In the video, it is seen that the boy was carried by his mother, with his father and another woman nearby. The priest appears to be comforting the child at first, but can be seen that he got irritated and slapped the chilled on the cheek, after which the child started crying harder. Instead of stopping or pulling away, the priest continued to hold on to the child even thought the mother started moving away from the priest. It got to the point where the father of the child had to forcibly remove his child from the priest’s grasp. The priest was identified to be Father Jacques Lacroix, 89 years old, from France. “ Since June 21, a video circulates in the press and social networks on which we can see a priest (89 years), celebrate the baptism of a child in Seine-et-Marne, ” ...
Composite photo of President Rodrigo Duterte (grabbed from Inquirer) and RPOC chair and Legazpi Mayor Noel Rosa (photo from Legazpi govt site) Bicol Regional Peace and Order Council (RPOC) chairman and Legazpi City Mayor Noel Rosa believes that President Rodrigo Duterte’s tagging of Naga as a “shabu hotbed” was backed up by data and might have basis. Rosal said that it was not impossible for a major city to have the presence of illegal drugs. “Hindi ako makakapagsabi kung totoo o hindi, pero ang masasabi ko lang dyan hindi imposible na may droga basta major cities. Everywhere you go, even in Legazpi, hindi ko yan pwede itago. Kaya nga continuous ang operations natin, as a matter of fact I would like to commend the PNP kasi we are moving forward na. Madami na tayong nahuli, not just small but big ones, almost more than 10 million na rin yung nakuha natin sa Legazpi,” Rosal said. He pointed out that President Duterte’s statement must be based on reports fr...
Comments