Skip to main content

NYU alumna details how LP's grand plan will backfire them down: "Aquino name will do more harm than good"


Benigno "Noynoy" Aquino | VP Leni Robredo | Sen. Antonio Trillanes 


If the grand plan of the Yellows is to turn to the name of the Aquinos as a means to save the Liberal Party (LP) in a last ditch effort then it will surely backfire.

This is the sentiment of social media influencer Krizette Laureta Chu when she detailed how the LP is on a losing end as more and more of its prominent members successively fail to rake in new supporters, contrary to what they hoped to achieve.

With Vice President Leni Robredo as their Opposition Leader, Chu opines that the constant mocking of the Vice President’s competence (or lack thereof) has led to a “wakeup call” for the Yellow political party to find a different means (or different person) to bring into the scene.


When the Yellow political party turned to Senator Antonio Trillanes IV, he had resorted to creating a fuss about threats on his life by rounding up more security forces around him which, unfortunately, backfired badly as the Philippine National Police (PNP) and Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) merely ignored his requests.

And now, they turn to, as Chu calls it, “last card” by summoning former President Benigno Aquino III into the active political scene to, hopefully, taint the current administration’s name and bring back the public trust onto the Yellow camp.

But, Chu explains, this is unlikely as Aquino’s long list of controversy could easily hold the Yellow political party back. From pilfered Yolanda donations, the controversy on the 44 Special Action Force (SAF) from PNP, the Dengvaxia anti-dengue vaccination sham, and the widely known Manila hostage crisis.

All these botches in his track record makes Chu certain that using Aquino as their last card will only end up doing “more harm than good”, thus resulting to not only lesser members on board LP, but even lesser public trust and a negative public image.


Chu’s full post on Facebook reads:

Nag iingay na si Noynoy Aquino.

Nilabas na ng LIBERAL PARTY ang kanilang pinaka huling baraha.

They are banking on the Aquino name, not knowing it will do more harm than good. Not with Noy's history of Yolanda, SAF, HO hostage, Dengvaxia, the China dealings of Trillanes they both wouldnt answer to.


Typhoon Yolanda | The Fallen 44 | Dengvaxia vaccine | West Philippine Sea 


Leni calling herself the Opposition leader, and being mocked for her incompetence, and then seeing that nobody is scrambling to join their party, has been a wakeup call that she cannot be the unifier they need.

Trillanes complaining that he had no security detail therefore his life was in danger--and not getting the reaction they wanted--was another wakeup call.

This is the beginning of the absolute end. They've crossed the rubicon, spiraling downward, and there is no turning back.

There is no Yellow-er guy than Noynoy Aquino, and this is their last shot.

The air, it's oh so redolent of desperation.

****

Dear avid readers, what do you think of this article? Please share your thoughts in the comment section below.


Comments

Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Popular posts from this blog

Try harder, Jover! Anti-Duterte blogger writes a trashy open letter to Atty. Glenn Chong

Jover Laurio of Pinoy Ako Blog and Atty. Glenn Chong, photos from Rappler In one of her latest blogs, the anti-Duterte blogger Jover Laurio of Pinoy Ako Blog (PAB) seem to steal Atty. Glenn Chong's thunder after writing an open letter for the latter which  —  by the looks of it  —  is lacking substance and therefore of poor quality or in other words, trashy. Colloquial term like 'Luh' and 'Uzi' which she later defined as 'Usisero' has been used by its writer in an open letter meant for a professional lawyer. How funny is that? In addition, her demeanor or approach on the said letter is just too much to take, specifically on the last part of it. Laurio, a social media personality that became quite familiar to some netizens due to her non-stop criticisms to the Duterte administration, is admired by the president's detractors because they see her as a beacon of hope for being vocal for her dissent. Some, on the other hand, strongly b...

Who’s irresponsible? Paolo Duterte vilifies Robredo over unverified facts on dr*g war.

Paolo “Pulong” Duterte and Leni Robredo / Composite photos from Manila Bulletin and positivelyfilipino.com Former Davao City Mayor Paolo “Pulong” Duterte takes a swipe at Vice President Leni Robredo for impulsively unveiling a list outlining personalities and organizations allegedly linked to unseat his father, President Rodrigo Duterte and destabilize the government. The younger Duterte, on Monday, shared an article previously written by former Cabinet Secretary Rigoberto ‘Bobi’ Tiglao in a Facebook post, lambasting VP Leni for making accusations against her own government based on patently false data about the President’s War On Dr*gs. “Teka, sino irresponsible? Look who’s talking! NAUNSA KA FVP? APIL APILON SAD KA NO? TRABAHO DIHA OI”, Pulong posted. Duterte also added ancient Greek Philosopher Plato’s quote, which read, “Wise men speak because they have something to say; FOOLS because they have to say something.” Paolo “Pulong” Duterte / Phoot from u...

SC to hear plea for gay marriage

THE Supreme Court (SC) en banc has released guidelines for next week’s oral arguments on a plea from gays and lesbians to allow same-sex marriage in the Philippines. A petition for certiorari was filed by Jesus Nicardo Falcis 3rd, who had sought the high court’s intervention to rule as null and void Executive Order (EO) 209 or the Family Code of the Philippines. (Photos credits to Owner) The oral arguments are set for Tuesday, June 19. The civil registrar general is the respondent in the petition lodged by LGBTS Christian Church Inc., Reverend Crescencio Agbayani Jr., Marlon Felipe and Maria Arlyn Ibañez. Fernando Perito, a lawyer, is the intervenor. In a four-page advisory, the court stated that the respondent and the petitioners should argue on: “A. Whether or not the petition and/or the petition in intervention is properly the subject of the exercise of the court’s power of judicial review; “B. Whether or not the right to marry and the right ...