Skip to main content

Duterte wants Cebu teen rape-slay case suspect rearrested

President Duterte said Tuesday evening that he ordered the re-arrest of the 17-year-old suspect behind the brutal killing of Christine Silawan who was found mutilated and her face skinned off in Cebu early this month.
President Rodrigo Duterte  (JANSEN ROMERO / MANILA BULLETIN)
President Rodrigo Duterte
(JANSEN ROMERO / MANILA BULLETIN)
In a speech late Tuesday, Duterte said he called the prosecutor who ordered the release of the suspect who was earlier reported to be the victim’s ex-lover.
“‘Yung nakapatay sa bata, ni-release and they act upon orders of the prosecutor. Tinawagan ko siya pagka-umaga (The one who killed Christine, they released her upon the orders of the prosecutor. I called them immediately the following morning),” Duterte said.
“Sabi ko i-recall mo ‘yang ano mo order ninyo of dismissal (I told them to recall their dismissal order) and have the guy rearrested,” he added.
Last week, the Lapu-Lapu City Prosecutor’s Office ordered the release of the 17-year-old suspect because the arrest made by the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) was supposedly invalid since it was done without a warrant.
According to Duterte, fiscals should know the definition of a hot pursuit operation.
“Kasi fiscal ako, fiscal ka. Marami man tayong abugado dito. Iyong interpretation ng hot pursuit (I am a fiscal, you are a fiscal. There are many lawyers here. Think about how you interpret a hot pursuit operation),” he said.
“Right after the commission of the crime, there is a hot pursuit. Continuous ‘yan hanggang mahuli mo (That will continue until you catch the perpetrator). Then you file a case,” he added.
“Hindi ako papayag na ganunin mo lang ang tao especially oppression. Patayin mo ang bata? Balatan mo tapos magsibat ka lang? Mahuli ka after six days tapos ma-release ka kasi hindi hot pursuit (I will not allow that you killed that victim and you will just be released. You are arrested and then be released six days later because it was not a hot pursuit)?” he continued.
“For as long as there is somebody who conducted investigation and made a follow-up everyday, that is still hot pursuit to me. Imposible ‘yang sabihin mo na hot pursuit 24 hours lang ngayon (It’s impossible that it should only last for 24 hours),” he said.
Silawan, a 16-year-old Grade 9 student was found dead in Lapu-Lapu City on March 11. Her body was discovered after she was deemed missing when she did not return after serving at the Church one Sunday this month.
The teenage suspect was nabbed by the NBI at his house in Barangay Maribago, Lapu-Lapu City a week after Silawan was killed.
Security camera footage showed that the suspect was with Silawan before she was killed in the evening of March 10.
Earlier, Duterte said Silawan was probably killed by someone under the influence of illegal drugs, and not by a cult as some people suspect because of how the victim was skinned and her internal organs taken out.
Source and Original Article from: >>> Manila Bulletin

Comments

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Popular posts from this blog

Try harder, Jover! Anti-Duterte blogger writes a trashy open letter to Atty. Glenn Chong

Jover Laurio of Pinoy Ako Blog and Atty. Glenn Chong, photos from Rappler In one of her latest blogs, the anti-Duterte blogger Jover Laurio of Pinoy Ako Blog (PAB) seem to steal Atty. Glenn Chong's thunder after writing an open letter for the latter which  —  by the looks of it  —  is lacking substance and therefore of poor quality or in other words, trashy. Colloquial term like 'Luh' and 'Uzi' which she later defined as 'Usisero' has been used by its writer in an open letter meant for a professional lawyer. How funny is that? In addition, her demeanor or approach on the said letter is just too much to take, specifically on the last part of it. Laurio, a social media personality that became quite familiar to some netizens due to her non-stop criticisms to the Duterte administration, is admired by the president's detractors because they see her as a beacon of hope for being vocal for her dissent. Some, on the other hand, strongly b...

Who’s irresponsible? Paolo Duterte vilifies Robredo over unverified facts on dr*g war.

Paolo “Pulong” Duterte and Leni Robredo / Composite photos from Manila Bulletin and positivelyfilipino.com Former Davao City Mayor Paolo “Pulong” Duterte takes a swipe at Vice President Leni Robredo for impulsively unveiling a list outlining personalities and organizations allegedly linked to unseat his father, President Rodrigo Duterte and destabilize the government. The younger Duterte, on Monday, shared an article previously written by former Cabinet Secretary Rigoberto ‘Bobi’ Tiglao in a Facebook post, lambasting VP Leni for making accusations against her own government based on patently false data about the President’s War On Dr*gs. “Teka, sino irresponsible? Look who’s talking! NAUNSA KA FVP? APIL APILON SAD KA NO? TRABAHO DIHA OI”, Pulong posted. Duterte also added ancient Greek Philosopher Plato’s quote, which read, “Wise men speak because they have something to say; FOOLS because they have to say something.” Paolo “Pulong” Duterte / Phoot from u...

SC to hear plea for gay marriage

THE Supreme Court (SC) en banc has released guidelines for next week’s oral arguments on a plea from gays and lesbians to allow same-sex marriage in the Philippines. A petition for certiorari was filed by Jesus Nicardo Falcis 3rd, who had sought the high court’s intervention to rule as null and void Executive Order (EO) 209 or the Family Code of the Philippines. (Photos credits to Owner) The oral arguments are set for Tuesday, June 19. The civil registrar general is the respondent in the petition lodged by LGBTS Christian Church Inc., Reverend Crescencio Agbayani Jr., Marlon Felipe and Maria Arlyn Ibañez. Fernando Perito, a lawyer, is the intervenor. In a four-page advisory, the court stated that the respondent and the petitioners should argue on: “A. Whether or not the petition and/or the petition in intervention is properly the subject of the exercise of the court’s power of judicial review; “B. Whether or not the right to marry and the right ...