Duterte exposes Leni Robredo for what she is: ALL TALK and no substance

Photo from getrealpundit.com

The fact that “vice president” Leni Robredo and supporters think Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte’s offer to her to be the Drug Czar is a “trap” means two things: 1) they were not prepared to take on the task they claim Duterte is failing on 2) they do not have an alternative solution to the problem. They just love to criticise.

The Yellows used to insist that there is no drug problem and that Duterte only exaggerated the issue so he can get elected. Now they are saying his drug war is failing. They can’t make up their minds. No wonder they always lose. They lose the debates and then lose the elections.

Seriously, why is Robredo always so negative? Surely there are some things Duterte is doing right even if she doesn’t agree with his drug war. But why doesn’t she highlight some good things for a change? She’s always trying to bring the govt down even though she’s part of it. We all know, of course, that Leni and her group just love to contradict those not from their clique.

The great modern day philosopher and Senate President is right on the nail. Those who are only good at talking crap should just zip it.

Source and Original Article:>>> getrealpundit.com

Comments

Using mahogany in our reforestation programs may be ecological suicide.

Photo from blueprint Name some of the most popular trees in our cities. Most people would include in their list the acacia, fire tree, mimosa and golden shower. Most people below 30—if they know the tree names—might also mention the African tulip, traveller’s palm and neem tree. Majestic acacias give rest to the eyes of the traffic-weary driving through Mckinley Road in Makati. Along Carcar avenue in Cebu, alternating with century-old acacias are centenarian mimosa or rain trees that flash fiery red, signaling summer to Carcaranons coming home for vacation. Rockwell would be unrecognizable if all the giant palms planted along its islands were suddenly gone. And there would be a huge public outcry if the spreading acacia and fire trees in UP Diliman campus were removed. People driving to and from Carcar and Cebu City are welcomed by 100-foot tall acacia and fire trees lining the National Highway in Brgy Perrelos. The trees, planted circa 1912, are not native to the P...

Try harder, Jover! Anti-Duterte blogger writes a trashy open letter to Atty. Glenn Chong

Jover Laurio of Pinoy Ako Blog and Atty. Glenn Chong, photos from Rappler In one of her latest blogs, the anti-Duterte blogger Jover Laurio of Pinoy Ako Blog (PAB) seem to steal Atty. Glenn Chong's thunder after writing an open letter for the latter which — by the looks of it — is lacking substance and therefore of poor quality or in other words, trashy. Colloquial term like 'Luh' and 'Uzi' which she later defined as 'Usisero' has been used by its writer in an open letter meant for a professional lawyer. How funny is that? In addition, her demeanor or approach on the said letter is just too much to take, specifically on the last part of it. Laurio, a social media personality that became quite familiar to some netizens due to her non-stop criticisms to the Duterte administration, is admired by the president's detractors because they see her as a beacon of hope for being vocal for her dissent. Some, on the other hand, strongly b...

SC to hear plea for gay marriage

THE Supreme Court (SC) en banc has released guidelines for next week’s oral arguments on a plea from gays and lesbians to allow same-sex marriage in the Philippines. A petition for certiorari was filed by Jesus Nicardo Falcis 3rd, who had sought the high court’s intervention to rule as null and void Executive Order (EO) 209 or the Family Code of the Philippines. (Photos credits to Owner) The oral arguments are set for Tuesday, June 19. The civil registrar general is the respondent in the petition lodged by LGBTS Christian Church Inc., Reverend Crescencio Agbayani Jr., Marlon Felipe and Maria Arlyn Ibañez. Fernando Perito, a lawyer, is the intervenor. In a four-page advisory, the court stated that the respondent and the petitioners should argue on: “A. Whether or not the petition and/or the petition in intervention is properly the subject of the exercise of the court’s power of judicial review; “B. Whether or not the right to marry and the right ...

Partner for Change Philippines

Search This Blog